The man at the window
Picture a man at a hotel window on the Normandy coast, before the town is fully awake, looking out at a gray harbor coming alive in the dawn. There is smoke already, and the dark shapes of ships at anchor, and a small orange sun pushing up through the mist over the water. The man has come home from running away from a war, and he is about to paint what he sees, fast, in one sitting, before the light changes. The picture he makes will be small, cheap, and so unfinished-looking that a critic will say wallpaper has more polish — and it will end up naming an entire movement in art, getting stolen at gunpoint, and becoming one of the most famous paintings on the planet. But all of that is later. Right now there is just the window, the harbor, and the painter.
The painter is Claude Monet (1840–1926), and this is no exotic scene he traveled to find. He grew up here. Not in Paris among the salons and the art schools, but in Le Havre(pronounced “luh AHV-ruh”), a busy port on the Normandy coast of northern France, where the river Seine meets the English Channel. His family moved there when he was about five, so the working harbor — the masts, the smoke, the gray Channel light, the sea fog rolling in off the water — was the view out the window of his childhood. When Monet paints Le Havre at dawn, he is painting home. (And he is not painting it alone, even if he is the one at the window: a loose band of like-minded young painters — Pissarro, Renoir, Sisley, and others we will meet properly in Paris — were already at work on the same problem of catching light fast and outdoors. Hold that thread; it matters for who gets the credit.)
A war, and a flight to London
But between the boy at the window and the man who made this picture, something happened, and it happened across the Channel. In 1870 the Franco-Prussian War broke out — France against the German states led by Prussia, a short, disastrous war that France lost badly, toppling its government in the process. Monet, who had no appetite for getting conscripted into a collapsing army, did what a lot of young men do when the world catches fire: he left. He went to London, and he sat out the war in exile in a foggy foreign city.
London turned out to be the most important thing that could have happened to his eye. Because in London he looked at English painting, and English painting had already done something French painting was still afraid to do: it had let solid things dissolve. He saw the work of J. M. W. Turner (1775–1851), who painted storms and sunsets and steam as if the whole world were melting into colored light, edges gone, forms barely hanging together. He saw James McNeill Whistler (1834–1903), an American painter living in London who made hushed, near-abstract studies of the Thames at night — the river, the bridges, the mist, all reduced to a few soft bands of tone. And he saw the actual thing those painters were painting: the Thames under coal smoke and river fog, a great modern city dissolved into haze, where you could not tell exactly where a building ended and the smoke began.
That is the lesson Monet brought home. Not a subject — he already had his subject, the harbor — but a permission. The permission to paint the haze instead of fighting through it. The permission to let a smokestack be a soft gray smear rather than a crisp drawn object, because a soft gray smear is, in fact, what a smokestack looks like at dawn through fog from across the water. (Years later a French critic, Ernest Chesneau, would look at Impression, Sunrise and see Turner and Whistler in it plainly. He was right.)
A working port, not a postcard
So Monet came back. He traveled home through the Netherlands and was back painting his home harbor by 1872. And here is the part that matters, the part it is easy to skate past: he did not come home and paint a pretty seaside. Le Havre in 1872 was not a postcard. It was one of the great working ports of France, a place of cranes and derricks (the tall arms that swing cargo on and off ships), of steamships and coal smoke, of factory chimneys going day and night. The traditional way to paint the sea — the marine(a seascape, a recognized respectable category of painting) — was clean, noble, timeless: tall ships, glittering water, maybe a heroic storm. Monet pointed his attention at the opposite of that. He pointed it at the smoke and the machinery, the modern, half-awake, industrial port at first light.
That choice is the whole quiet argument of the picture before it ever gets to Paris. A painter who learned in London that fog and smoke could bethe subject, standing at a window over his own childhood harbor, deciding that the cranes and the chimneys and the gray morning haze were worth a serious canvas — not in spite of being unglamorous, but because they were the real, present-tense, working world. He just had to wait for the right morning.